much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? the speaker claims so，i concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however i fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. and i will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
to begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. nevertheless i prefer to arguer that facts never change. no matter how did the medieval church and inquisition persecute bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. equally，no matter how edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.